According to @milesdeutscher, ICObench has published an in-depth report analyzing what separates successful ICOs from failures, positioned as research to help users spot good ICOs (source: @milesdeutscher on X, Dec 8, 2025). According to the source, the post does not include the TLDR or specific metrics, so traders should refer directly to the ICObench report for quantitative filters and due-diligence criteria before committing to allocations or secondary-market strategies (source: @milesdeutscher on X, Dec 8, 2025).

According to @JasonSoraVC, allocating $300 million to an unproven management team mirrors the excesses of 2017 ICOs and should be avoided. According to @JasonSoraVC, so-called DATs are described as another ICO-style fundraising mechanism that poses high risk to capital allocators. According to @JasonSoraVC, traders should stay away from DAT offerings and avoid committing large sums without proven execution history. According to @JasonSoraVC, this stance prioritizes strict due diligence and capital preservation when evaluating DAT-related deals.